Far-left MSNBC host Elie Mystal this week prompt Joe Biden can order a preemptive strike on Mar-a-Lago as he argued towards Trump’s immunity claims.
“So if the Supreme Court docket says that the presidents have this, you realize, full immunity from prosecution and no matter, what’s to cease, oh, I don’t know, the precise president Joe Biden from launching a preemptive strike on a insurgent stronghold at Mar-a-Lago to engineer regime change? What’s to cease Biden from doing that, proper?” Elie Mystal stated.
He continued, “For the document, as Andrew [Weissmann] was saying, I don’t assume that Biden has the ability to launch a strike towards his political rival, proper?”
“Trump doesn’t appear to know — and the individuals who assist Trump don’t appear to know — that the powers he calls onto himself should be given to each single different president. However I believe John Roberts will perceive that,” Elie Mystal stated.
.@ElieNYC on Trump’s immunity argument: “Trump doesn’t appear to know—and the individuals who assist Trump don’t appear to know—that the powers he calls onto himself should be given to each single different president. However I believe John Roberts will perceive that.” pic.twitter.com/I2T8L672g0
— All In with Chris Hayes (@allinwithchris) January 19, 2024
Elie Mystal’s insane rant echoed absurd hypothetical arguments about Trump’s immunity claims lobbed by employed gun Jack Smith and Biden-appointed decide Florence Pan.
Earlier this month President Trump’s lawyer John Sauer appeared before a three-judge panel for the DC Circuit Court docket of Appeals on Tuesday morning to argue Trump’s immunity claims in Jack Smith’s DC case.
The three-judge panel listening to oral arguments on immunity claims: Florence Pan (Biden appointee), Michelle Childs (Biden appointee), and Karen Henderson (George W. Bush appointee).
Recall that Jack Smith went fully off the rails and instructed a federal appeals courtroom that Trump’s immunity argument would allow him to order his supporters to murder opposing lawmakers.
Trump’s legal professionals argued that Trump is immune from federal prosecution for alleged ‘crimes’ dedicated whereas he served as US President.
Jack Smith argued Trump isn’t immune from prosecution as a result of he might order the homicide of his political opponents or promote nuclear secrets and techniques.
“The implications of the defendant’s broad immunity concept are sobering. In his view, a courtroom ought to deal with a President’s prison conduct as immune from prosecution so long as it takes the type of correspondence with a state official a couple of matter in which there’s a federal curiosity, a gathering with a member of the Govt Department, or a press release on a matter of public concern,” in keeping with Jack Smith’s 82-page filing reviewed by The Gateway Pundit.
Jack Smith’s staff argued that if Trump is protected by the presidential immunity argument, what might cease him from telling his “inciting his supporters throughout a State of the Union handle to kill opposing lawmakers…”
A 3-judge panel heard oral arguments on Tuesday and appeared skeptical of Trump’s immunity claims – one decide, a Biden appointee, requested lawyer John Sauer if Trump could be topic to prison prosecution if he ordered SEAL Workforce 6 to assassinate his political rivals.
“Might a president who ordered SEAL Workforce 6 to assassinate a political rival, and isn’t impeached, would he be topic to prison prosecution?” Choose Florence Pan, a Biden appointee requested John Sauer.
John Sauer, former Solicitor Normal of Missouri and good friend of The Gateway Pundit, replied, “If he had been impeached and convicted first… my reply is certified sure, there’s a political course of that must happen below the construction of our Structure which might require impeachment and conviction by the Senate in these distinctive circumstances…”